奶牛性情评定方法及其影响因素分析

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.03.004

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 488-496.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.03.004

奶牛性情评定方法及其影响因素分析

张驰¹, 罗宇茜¹, 王嘉熠¹, 常瑶¹, 李源韬¹, 苏义童¹, 黄铭逸¹, 徐伟¹, 张海亮¹, 董刚辉², 李锡智², 王雅春^1*

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193;
2. 北京首农畜牧发展有限公司, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2018-03-23 发布日期:2018-03-23
通讯作者: 王雅春,主要从事分子数量遗传学研究,E-mail:wangyachun@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:张驰(1996-),男,四川成都人,本科生,主要从事动物科学研究,E-mail:530647550@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业（奶牛）产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-36）；现代农业产业技术体系北京市奶牛创新团队（BAIC06-2017）；长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT_15R62）

Study on Scoring Method and Influencing Factors of Temperament in Dairy Cows

ZHANG Chi¹, LUO Yu-xi¹, WANG Jia-yi¹, CHANG Yao¹, LI Yuan-tao¹, SU Yi-tong¹, HUANG Ming-yi¹, XU Wei¹, ZHANG Hai-liang¹, DONG Gang-hui², LI Xi-zhi², WANG Ya-chun^1*

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Beijing Sunlon Livestock Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100029, China

Received:2017-08-25 Online:2018-03-23 Published:2018-03-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在建立简便可行的奶牛性情评定方法并探究性情在奶牛生产中的重要性，本研究采用两种简便、快捷的性情评分方法，于2016年7-8月在北京地区7个牛场现场评定3 988头处于泌乳期的荷斯坦牛，采用固定模型分析奶牛性情的影响因素及性情对产奶量、体况评分（BCS）的影响。分析表明，两种方法均能显示奶牛性情的差异，且两种性情评分方法均值差异仅为0.04，秩相关检验无显著差异；不同场、胎次、泌乳阶段的奶牛性情评分之间有显著性差异（P<0.05），头胎牛性情暴躁的概率高于经产牛，泌乳高峰期（45~99 d）奶牛性情暴躁的概率高于其他泌乳阶段，尤其高于泌乳期天数300 d以后的阶段。奶牛性情评分对校正奶量和BCS均无显著影响，但不同性情评分奶牛在产奶性能上存在差异。本研究提出的两种性情评分方法简便易行，可用于快速评定大规模牛群的性情，为改善牛群福利、提高管理水平提供便利工具。

Abstract:

To establish simple and feasible methods to evaluate the temperament of dairy cow and study the importance of temperament in dairy production, totally 3 988 milking Holstein cows from 7 large-scale farms in Beijing were assessed to derive their temperament scores based on two easy and quick scoring methods of temperament in dairy cows during July and August in 2016. The influence factors of temperament score and the effects of temperament on milk yield and body condition score (BCS) were analyzed using fixed effect model. The results showed that both of the two methods could reveal the variation of the temperament among dairy cows, and there was no significant differences between the ranking of the two scoring methods based on rank correlation test, there was a trivial difference of 0.04 between the mean values of two scoring methods. Farm, parity and lactation stage had significant effects on temperament score (P<0.05). The proportion of bad temperament cows tended to be higher in the first parity, and probability of dairy cows with bad temperament during lactation peak period (45-99 d) was higher than that in other lactation stages, especially when comparing to cows in the stage of later than 300 days in milk. The effects of temperament score on corrected milk yield and BCS were not significant (P>0.05), however cows with different temperament scores differed in their milk production. The two temperament scoring methods for dairy cow proposed in this study are simple and easy to apply, and can be used to assess the temperament of cows in large-scale farms efficiently, which can provide convenient tools to improve the cow welfare and management.

中图分类号:

S823.91

张驰, 罗宇茜, 王嘉熠, 常瑶, 李源韬, 苏义童, 黄铭逸, 徐伟, 张海亮, 董刚辉, 李锡智, 王雅春. 奶牛性情评定方法及其影响因素分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(3): 488-496.

ZHANG Chi, LUO Yu-xi, WANG Jia-yi, CHANG Yao, LI Yuan-tao, SU Yi-tong, HUANG Ming-yi, XU Wei, ZHANG Hai-liang, DONG Gang-hui, LI Xi-zhi, WANG Ya-chun. Study on Scoring Method and Influencing Factors of Temperament in Dairy Cows[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2018, 49(3): 488-496.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.03.004

https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/Y2018/V49/I3/488

参考文献

[1] SUTHERLAND M A, ROGERS A R, VERKERK G A. The effect of temperament and responsiveness towards humans on the behavior, physiology and milk production of multi-parous dairy cows in a familiar and novel milking environment[J]. Physiol Behav, 2012, 107(3):329-337.
[2] FRONDELIUS L, JÄRVENRANTA K, KOPONEN T, et al. The effects of body posture and temperament on heart rate variability in dairy cows[J]. Physiol Behav, 2015, 139:437-441.
[3] 米法英, 王翠芳, 敖长金, 等. 动物福利对奶牛生产性能的影响[J]. 中国奶牛, 2016, 317(9):4-8.
MI F Y, WANG C F, AO C J, et al. Effect of animal welfare on the performance in dairy cows[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2016, 317(9):4-8. (in Chinese)
[4] SEABROOK M F. The psychological interaction between the stockman and his animals and its influence on performance of pigs and dairy cows[J]. Vet Rec, 1984, 115(4):84-87.
[5] SANCHEZ N C B, CARROLL J A, BROADWAY P R, et al. Cattle temperament influences metabolism:metabolic response to glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity tests in beef steers[J]. Domest Anim Endocrinol, 2016, 56:85-95.
[6] DODZI M S, MUCHENJE V. Avoidance-related behavioural variables and their relationship to milk yield in pasture-based dairy cows[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2011, 133(1-2):11-17.
[7] HOLSTEIN U K. A useful guide to Linear Assessment[EB/OL]. (2017-11) http://www.holstein-uk.org/media/legacyhw/Breeding%20for%20HW/Breeding-Linear-Assessment.pdf.
[8] KOVÁCS L, KÉZÉR F L, TÖZSÉR J, et al. Heart rate and heart rate variability in dairy cows with different temperament and behavioural reactivity to humans[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8):e0136294.
[9] FORKMAN B, BOISSY A, MEUNIER-SALAVN M C, et al. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses[J]. Physiol Behav, 2007, 92(3):340-374.
[10] ROUSING T, BONDE M, BADSBERG J H, et al. Stepping and kicking behaviour during milking in relation to response in human-animal interaction test and clinical health in loose housed dairy cows[J]. Livest Prod Sci, 2004, 88(1-2):1-8.
[11] DODZI M S, MUCHENJE V. Avoidance-related behavioural variables and their relationship to milk yield in pasture-based dairy cows[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2011, 133(1-2):11-17.
[12] RUSHEN J, DE PASSILLÉ A M B, MUNKSGAARD L. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1999, 82(4):720-727.
[13] BREUER K, HEMSWORTH P H, BARNETT J L, et al. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000, 66(4):273-288.
[14] WILDMAN E E, JONES G M, WAGNER P E, et al. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1982, 65(3):495-501.
[15] 郭刚, 王雅春, 孙东晓, 等. 体细胞评分(SCS)的变异规律分析[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会第七届养牛学分会2009年学术研讨会论文集. 南京:中国畜牧兽医学会, 2009.
GUO G, WANG Y C, SUN D X, et al. Analysis of the variation of somatic cell score (SCS)[C]//. Nanjing:Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Association, 2009. (in Chinese)
[16] 吕文龙. DHI报告的正确解读[J]. 今日畜牧兽医, 2014(8):53-55.
LV W L. The correct understanding of DHI report[J]. Today Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2014(8):53-55. (in Chinese)
[17] GRIGNARD L, BOISSY A, BOIVIN X, et al. The social environment influences the behavioural responses of beef cattle to handling[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000, 68(1):1-11.
[18] 黄鸿威. 奶牛习性与奶牛舒适[J]. 今日畜牧兽医, 2014(6):47-48.
HUANG H W. The habit and comfort of cow[J]. Today Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2014(6):47-48. (in Chinese)
[19] 王琨, 邢震全, 李国滨. 泌乳期奶牛的饲喂[J]. 黑龙江动物繁殖, 2003, 11(2):29.
WANG K, XING Z Q, LI G B. Feeding of lactating cows[J]. Heilongjiang Journal of Animal Reproduction, 2003, 11(2):29. (in Chinese)
[20] UETAKE K, KILGOUR R J, ISHIWATA T, et al. Temperament assessments of lactating cows in three contexts and their applicability as management traits[J]. Anim Sci J, 2004, 75(6):571-576.
[21] SZENTLÉLEKI A, NAGY K, SZÉPLAKI K, et al. Behavioural responses of primiparous and multiparous dairy cows to the milking process over an entire lactation[J]. Ann Anim Sci, 2015, 15(1):185-195.
[22] KOVÁCS L, KÉZÉR L, TOÖZSÉR J. Measuring stress level of dairy cows during milking using by geometric indices of heart rate variability[J]. Scient Pap:Anim Sci Biotechnol, 2013, 46(1):213-217.
[23] RUSHEN J, DE PASSILLÉ A M B, MUNKSGAARD L. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1999, 82(4):720-727.
[24] BREUER K, HEMSWORTH P H, BARNETT J L, et al. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000, 66(4):273-288.
[25] HEDLUND L, LØVLIE H. Personality and production:nervous cows produce less milk[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2015, 98(9):5819-5828.
[26] COOKE R F, BOHNERT D W, MENEGHETTI M, et al. Effects of temperament on pregnancy rates to fixed-timed AI in Bos indicus beef cows[J]. Livest Sci, 2011, 142(1-3):108-113.
[27] MORRIS C A, CULLEN N G, KILGOUR R, et al. Some genetic factors affecting temperament in Bos taurus cattle[J]. New Zeal J Agr Res, 1994, 37(2):167-175.
[28] SCHMUTZ S M, STOOKEY J M, WINKELMAN-SIM D C, et al. A QTL study of cattle behavioral traits in embryo transfer families[J]. J Hered, 2001, 92(3):290-292.
[29] VASSEUR E, GIBBONS J, RUSHEN J, et al. Development and implementation of a training program to ensure high repeatability of body condition scoring of dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2013, 96(7):4725-4737.

奶牛性情评定方法及其影响因素分析

Study on Scoring Method and Influencing Factors of Temperament in Dairy Cows

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹建华, 杨柏高, 张培培, 冯肖艺, 张航, 余洲, 牛一凡, 郝海生, 杜卫华, 朱化彬, 杨凌, 赵学明. 能量负平衡影响奶牛卵泡发育的机制[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 22-30.
[2]	孙东晓, 张胜利, 张勤, 李姣, 张桂香, 刘丑生, 郑伟杰. 我国奶牛基因组选择技术应用进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4028-4039.
[3]	冯肖艺, 郝海生, 杜卫华, 朱化彬, 崔凯, 赵学明. 能量负平衡导致奶牛繁殖力下降的机制进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4050-4060.
[4]	褚楚, 张静静, 丁磊, 樊懿楷, 包向男, 向世馨, 刘锐, 罗雪路, 任小丽, 李春芳, 刘文举, 王亮, 刘莉, 李永青, 江汉, 李委奇, 孙伟, 李喜和, 温万, 周佳敏, 张淑君. 基于中红外光谱的牛奶中三种氨基酸含量预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3299-3312.
[5]	张航, 杨柏高, 徐茜, 冯肖艺, 杜卫华, 郝海生, 朱化彬, 张培培, 赵学明. 热应激影响奶牛胚胎发育作用机制的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2692-2700.
[6]	王振宇, 张赛博, 刘文慧, 梁栋, 任小丽, 闫磊, 闫跃飞, 高腾云, 张震, 黄河天. 基于SNP芯片数据分析不同奶牛场基因组近交系数及筛选功能性基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2848-2857.
[7]	黄上真, 马龙刚, 娄文琦, 宁景扬, 张海亮, 胡丽蓉, 扎琼, 李斌, 徐青, 巴桑罗布, 王雅春. 高原地区奶牛血液指标的影响因素分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(5): 1964-1978.
[8]	贾鸿儒, 杨超群, 王萌, 吴章情, 昝林森, 杨武才. LRTN4RL1-AS通过miR-27a-3p靶向PPARγ调节奶牛乳腺细胞乳脂合成[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(4): 1465-1477.
[9]	刘爱瑜, 冯曼, 李永亮, 赵心念, 郭建军, 王亚男, 高玉红. 卷帘舍环境参数与奶牛泌乳性能及行为的相关性分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(2): 617-629.
[10]	王逸群, 刘祖培, 李雅婷, 张海森, 李丹, 靳亚平, 陈华涛. 奶牛NR1D1基因的真核表达载体构建、表达谱及其在卵巢组织的定位[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(1): 133-145.
[11]	刘佳敏, 禹保军, 母童, 张迪, 冯小芳, 张娟, 王影, 温万, 顾亚玲. 奶牛乳脂代谢关键miRNAs的筛选及鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(12): 4244-4257.
[12]	王川川, 母童, 冯小芳, 禹保军, 张娟, 顾亚玲. 基于转录组测序挖掘奶牛乳脂代谢关键候选基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(10): 3421-3433.
[13]	任宇, 燕文荃, 丁玥竹, 扈孟雪, 周杰珑, 吴培福, 陈粉粉, 刘莉莉. VPS28通过泛素化信号通路调控奶牛乳腺上皮细胞中乳蛋白的合成[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(8): 2558-2567.
[14]	魏士昊, 戴天姝, 王锋, 史远刚, 马云, 淡新刚. 奶牛早孕诊断技术研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(7): 2047-2056.
[15]	庞志旭, 张洪志, 乔利英, 王万年, 潘洋洋, 刘文忠. 基于元共祖的基因组联合育种模拟研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(7): 2172-2181.